Let’s get one thing straight: AI is a tool, not a leader.
It can crunch numbers, spot patterns, and automate processes faster than any human ever could. But when it comes to understanding people, culture, and workplace dynamics? AI is completely out of its depth.
It can’t read between the lines of an awkward meeting. It won’t pick up on unspoken tensions between teams. And it definitely doesn’t understand what it feels like to be the only person in the room who doesn’t feel like they belong.
For workplaces striving for inclusion, trust, and real cultural transformation, AI isn’t the answer – humans are.
AI isn’t neutral, it’s a mirror. And what it reflects back at us depends entirely on the data we feed it.
If that data is full of historical bias, systemic inequalities, and flawed assumptions (spoiler: it usually is), AI will reinforce those patterns rather than break them. Racist hiring algorithms? Discriminatory credit scoring systems? AI models that assume men are better leaders? These aren’t sci-fi horror stories – they’re already happening.
And yet, organisations keep throwing AI at inclusion problems like it’s a magic fix (spoiler again! it’s not).
Because AI doesn’t ask, “Who’s missing from the data set?”
AI doesn’t push back and say, “Actually, this decision is unethical.”
And AI definitely doesn’t say, “Hey, maybe we should have a Brave Conversation about this.”
That’s where real human leadership comes in.
There’s a fundamental difference between knowing what is happening and understanding why it’s happening. AI is great at spotting trends, but it takes cultural intelligence, emotional awareness, and lived experience to interpret them correctly.
This is why workplaces need anthropology and cultural humility alongside AI – not instead of it.
The real question isn’t whether AI should be used in workplaces, it’s who is guiding it.
If AI is left unchecked, it will automate bias, reinforce exclusion, and widen existing gaps. But when organisations put human-centered leadership at the core, AI can actually serve a purpose – supporting ethical decision-making, not replacing it.
That’s why workplaces need Brave Conversations, not just AI implementation plans.
Because at the end of the day, inclusion isn’t a data problem, it’s a leadership one.
When workplaces rely on AI alone to “fix” diversity, bias, or decision-making, they miss the point entirely. Inclusion isn’t about algorithms – it’s about trust, culture, and leadership. AI might be able to analyze trends, but it can’t build psychological safety, challenge unconscious bias, or create workplaces where people actually want to show up and contribute.
The real work? That still falls on humans.
So, the question is this: Are you letting AI drive your workplace culture, or are you using it as a tool to enhance human judgment, leadership, and connection?
Sign-up to our mailing list for weekly human hacks, anthropic insights and news from Habitus.
